Episode 56: Henry Bauer and Dogmatism
Episode 56: Henry Bauer and Dogmatism [ 1 h 12 min 00 s | 32.96 MB ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (648)In this episode, Dr. Henry Bauer speaks with David Crowe and Elizabeth Ely about his latest book, “Dogmatism in Science and Medicine: How Dominant Theories Monopolize Research and Stifle the Search for Truth” (available on Amazon and at other booksellers).
Comments (3)Episode 47: Dr. Henry Bauer on Science
In Dr. Henry Bauer’s second appearance on this podcast he discusses philosophical problems with science with David Crowe and Terry Michael. This includes the process of science, resistance to change and other scientific failures.
Comment (0)XTRA: David Crowe, Celia Farber, Henry Bauer with Gary Null
David Crowe, Celia Farber, Henry Bauer with Gary Null [ 2 h 07 min 12 s | 58.23 MB ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (861)Dr. Henry Bauer, Celia Farber and David Crowe talk about HIV and AIDS in the lead-up to World AIDS Day 2011 on the Gary Null radio show.
Comment (0)Episode 37: Syphilis Conundrums, Quackbuster Randi and Rethinkers in Korea
In this episode, David presents a slightly different format by playing clips from the current media and commenting on them. He begins the episode with some listener feedback and some news items. Then, in the first clip, Susan Reverby describes how she uncovered a series of U.S. experiments in Guatemala (now deemed unethical), where prostitutes and prison inmates were inoculated with syphilis. David points out the distorted logic and the lack of evidence for sexual transmission of the disease. In the next clip, former magician James Randi contradicts himself as he discusses whether science is imposed by authority or discovered by critical thinking.
Comments (4)Episode 18: Dr. Henry Bauer
Celia, David and Terry Michael talk with the author of “The origin, persistence and failings of HIV/AIDS theory” and the new paper, “HIV Tests Are Not HIV Tests” about the difference between HIV and AIDS statistics, particular with regard to race and gender.
Comment (1)